OPS 405 · Unit 1 of 6
Quality Systems and Customer Requirements
Quality, Lean and Continuous Improvement
Start unit · 4 lessons →Learning objectives
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
- Frame operations decisions with owners, dates, and guardrails
- Apply the frameworks in "Quality Systems and Customer Requirements" to a real management decision
- Make progress on your One-page Atlas decision memo per unit applied project
Why this matters
Quality Systems and Customer Requirements connects analytics, network, service, program, quality, and procurement decisions at Atlas Outdoor Gear.
Lesson
Unit overview
Complete all 4 lessons in order. Each lesson uses Atlas Outdoor Gear worked examples, practice problems, and managerial judgment prompts consistent with the program gold standard.
Connection to applied work
This unit feeds directly into One-page Atlas decision memo per unit. As you read, capture notes, examples, and data you can reuse in that deliverable. Strong students finish each unit with a draft section of their project, not just highlights.
Practice
- Write a one-page summary of this unit in your own words without looking at the lesson.
- Find a real company example (public filing, news article, or personal experience) that illustrates the main concept.
- Draft one paragraph recommending an action a manager should take based on this unit.
- Add at least three terms from this unit to your course glossary.
Knowledge check
Answer these without notes before marking the unit complete:
- What is the central idea of "Quality Systems and Customer Requirements"?
- What mistake do beginners most often make when applying this material?
- How does this unit help you complete One-page Atlas decision memo per unit?
- What is one decision you face this month where this unit applies?
Key takeaways
- Frame operations decisions with owners, dates, and guardrails
- Business concepts only matter when they change a decision.
- Your OPS 405 assessment (Quality Systems and Customer Requirements applied at Atlas Outdoor Gear with reconciled metrics and decision frames.) rewards applied understanding, not memorization.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under OPS 405.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your OPS 405 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Reflection
Reflect on how the unit concepts apply to your work.
Deliverable
Reflection document in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Specific personal or observed example
- • Connects unit concepts to behavior
- • Identifies a concrete behavior change
- • Honest and analytical tone
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Atlas OTIF is 89% while DC pick rate improved 8%. For Quality Systems and Customer Requirements, what should Mei Lin prioritize first?
2. Which evidence label fits a before/after OTIF chart with no control group for key concepts and vocabulary in quality systems and customer requirements?
3. Carlos proposes a change in Quality Systems and Customer Requirements that helps landed cost but risks two-point OTIF drop. Best next step?
4. A common failure mode when applying quality systems and customer requirements: applied business decisions at Atlas is:
5. Which workbook element is mandatory for OPS 405 applied work on Quality Systems and Customer Requirements?
6. Greg Santos sees a sewing defect drop from 2.1% to 1.4% after a crackdown. What statistical question comes first?
7. Atlas has four dashboards showing different fill rates. Root issue?
8. Best pairing for quality systems and customer requirements: applied business decisions recommendation quality?