theonline.mba
← Back to MKT 403

MKT 403 · Unit 4 of 6

Competitive Pricing and Game Theory

Pricing Strategy and Revenue Growth

Start unit · 4 lessons →

Learning objectives

After completing this unit, you will be able to:

  • undefined
  • Apply the frameworks in "Competitive Pricing and Game Theory" to a real management decision
  • Make progress on your Concentration case analysis applied project

Why this matters

Competitive Pricing and Game Theory applies BrightBrew examples to specialized marketing decisions with worked problems, guardrails, and assessments.

Lesson

Unit overview

Complete all 4 lessons in order. Each lesson uses the BrightBrew anchor from MKT 201/202 with MBA-depth prose, reconciled numbers, practice problems, and managerial judgment prompts. Finish unit exercises and the knowledge check before marking the unit complete.

Connection to applied work

This unit feeds directly into Concentration case analysis. As you read, capture notes, examples, and data you can reuse in that deliverable. Strong students finish each unit with a draft section of their project, not just highlights.

Practice

  1. Write a one-page summary of this unit in your own words without looking at the lesson.
  2. Find a real company example (public filing, news article, or personal experience) that illustrates the main concept.
  3. Draft one paragraph recommending an action a manager should take based on this unit.
  4. Add at least three terms from this unit to your course glossary.

Knowledge check

Answer these without notes before marking the unit complete:

  1. What is the central idea of "Competitive Pricing and Game Theory"?
  2. What mistake do beginners most often make when applying this material?
  3. How does this unit help you complete Concentration case analysis?
  4. What is one decision you face this month where this unit applies?

Key takeaways

  • undefined
  • Business concepts only matter when they change a decision.
  • Your MKT 403 assessment (Pricing Strategy and Revenue Growth) rewards applied understanding, not memorization.

Unit assessment

Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.

50% applied project30% case work20% knowledge checks

Exercises

Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.

ExerciseApplied practice: Competitive Pricing and Game Theory45 min
Complete a focused practice exercise on **Competitive Pricing and Game Theory**. 1. Choose a real company, product, or situation you know. 2. Apply one core framework from this unit to analyze it. 3. Write your analysis in 300–500 words with a clear recommendation. 4. Cite at least one credible source.

Deliverable

300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under MKT 403.

Rubric

  • • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
  • • Specific evidence from a real example
  • • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
  • • Professional writing with source citation
ExerciseDrill: Competitive Pricing and Game Theory30 min
Work through the practice problems in the unit lesson without looking at notes. Then check your work against the lesson and write a short reflection: - What you got right - One mistake you caught - One concept to review before the next unit

Deliverable

Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your MKT 403 workbook.

Rubric

  • • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
  • • Honest reflection on errors
  • • Identifies a specific review action

Case analysis

Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.

CaseCase analysis: Competitive Pricing and Game Theory60 min
Analyze a real business case through the lens of **Competitive Pricing and Game Theory**. Choose a public company event, HBR-style case, or documented decision. **Deliverable structure:** 1. Situation summary (150 words) 2. Analysis using this unit's frameworks (400 words) 3. Recommendation (150 words) 4. Risks and what would change your mind

Deliverable

2-page case write-up in your portfolio.

Rubric

  • • Case facts are accurate and sourced
  • • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
  • • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
  • • Risks are specific, not generic

Knowledge quiz

Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.

1. BrightBrew leadership debates competitive pricing and game theory. Which framing best matches MKT 403 managerial purpose?

2. For share of voice win rate post-response, BrightBrew reports baseline near 38.0% and a treatment scenario near 52.0%. What is the guardrail Elena should monitor?

3. A manager cites one vivid customer story to justify scaling competitive pricing and game theory nationally. What is the best next step?

4. Which competitor comparison is most relevant to this unit's BrightBrew work?

5. Sam Rivera wants to scale spend while share of voice win rate post-response is up but gross margin per acquired subscriber is deteriorating. What should leadership do?

6. Which framework pairing belongs to this unit?

7. BrightBrew serves 142,000 subscribers with 4.2% monthly churn and $42 CAC. Why does competitive pricing and game theory require subscriber-scale thinking?

8. Which evidence label is appropriate when BrightBrew has only historical cohort patterns for competitive pricing and game theory and no experiment yet?

Next unit: Promotions, Discounts and Revenue Management →