GPS 402 · Unit 6 of 6
Political Strategy, Ethics and Accountability
Business, Government and Public Policy
Start unit · 4 lessons →Unit overview
This unit develops political strategy, ethics, and accountability using Solara Foods as the anchor. You will apply ethical advocacy checklist, accountability matrix, reputational risk register, board oversight of policy to a live decision: Rebuild political strategy with ethics guardrails and external audit
Learning objectives
By the end of this unit, you should be able to:
- Explain core vocabulary for political strategy, ethics, and accountability in plain language with Solara Foods examples
- Apply ethical advocacy checklist to structure options, assumptions, and tradeoffs
- Build reconciled evidence tables with leading indicators and guardrail metrics
- Produce a decision memo with kill criteria and stakeholder dissent
Solara scenario
Whistleblower alleges Solara understated lobbying contacts in EU transparency filing. Board orders independent review of global policy engagement after filing error
Lessons in this unit
- Foundations and framing
- Concepts, mechanics, and operating rhythm
- Frameworks, evidence, and tradeoffs
- Applied decisions, case analysis, and executive synthesis
Assessment
Complete the unit knowledge check and applied exercise after Lesson 4. The exercise asks for a two-page memo on Rebuild political strategy with ethics guardrails and external audit with reconciliation checks and kill criteria.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under GPS 402.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your GPS 402 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Solara Foods faces: Whistleblower alleges Solara understated lobbying contacts in EU transparency filing. Which framing best matches executive decision practice?
2. Which evidence label is correctly applied for Solara Foods?
3. Omar Haddad asks which framework fits Board orders independent review of global policy engagement after filing error. Best answer?
4. Finance challenges a $17-scale recommendation in GPS 402. What passes scrutiny?
5. Which kill criterion is strongest for political strategy, ethics, and accountability?
6. Stakeholder dissent is healthiest when:
7. Best one-sentence decision ask for this unit?
8. Solara Foods operates in 42 markets. What mistake should you avoid?