ENT 406 · Unit 3 of 6
Growth Finance and Resource Allocation
Scaling Startups and High-Growth Organizations
Start unit · 4 lessons →Learning objectives
- Run OKRs and operating cadence at startup speed
- Apply "Growth Finance and Resource Allocation" to a real venture decision
- Contribute to your Quarterly OKR cascade deliverable
Unit overview
| # | Lesson | Core idea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Strategic Logic of Growth Finance and Resource Allocation | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 2 | Methods and Models for Growth Finance and Resource Allocation | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 3 | Evidence, Metrics and Assumptions in Growth Finance and Resource Allocation | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 4 | Growth Finance and Resource Allocation: From Analysis to Action | Core frameworks for this unit |
Complete all four lessons, then finish unit assessments on this page.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ENT 406.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ENT 406 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. RelayOps has $11.2M cash and $607K monthly net burn after reallocation. Approximate runway in months?
2. Which headcount gate does RelayOps tie to onboarding performance?
3. RelayOps annual net burn ~$7.3M and net new ARR ~$3.6M. Burn multiple equals:
4. An assumption ledger entry for 'CSM hire reduces cycle 0.3 weeks' should be downgraded when:
5. RelayOps minimum cash policy is 6 months net burn (~$3.64M at $607K/mo). Ending cash projects to $3.34M before raise. Best finance action?
6. Zero-based quarterly prioritization means:
7. ARR miss of 14% is attributed 60% to onboarding delay and 40% to win rate. Correct variance response?
8. Rule of 40 for RelayOps: ~85% growth + (-15%) EBITDA margin ≈ 70. This suggests: