ENT 405 · Unit 3 of 6
Market, Team and Product Diligence
Venture Capital and Startup Investing
Start unit · 4 lessons →Learning objectives
- Run due diligence across team, market, product, and economics
- Apply "Market, Team and Product Diligence" to a real venture decision
- Contribute to your Term sheet comparison memo deliverable
Unit overview
| # | Lesson | Core idea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Strategic Logic of Market, Team and Product Diligence | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 2 | Methods and Models for Market, Team and Product Diligence | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 3 | Evidence, Metrics and Assumptions in Market, Team and Product Diligence | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 4 | Market, Team and Product Diligence: From Analysis to Action | Core frameworks for this unit |
Complete all four lessons, then finish unit assessments on this page.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ENT 405.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ENT 405 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. RelayOps reports 118% NRR. This primarily signals:
2. Bottom-up SOM: 12,000 ICP firms × 12% attach × $14,253 ACV ≈ ?
3. Verified ARR in diligence should tie to:
4. RelayOps cash $1.1M and burn $280K/month implies runway about:
5. Team diligence for RelayOps flags VP Sales gap. Appropriate response:
6. Customer reference scripts should ask about pain before product to:
7. LTV/CAC for RelayOps roughly 3.35x with 14-month payback suggests:
8. Diligence should end with: