theonline.mba
← Back to ENT 401

ENT 401 · Unit 3 of 6

Interview Design and Field Research

Customer Discovery and Opportunity Validation

Start unit · 4 lessons →

Learning objectives

  • Size markets with bottom-up and top-down logic
  • Apply "Interview Design and Field Research" to a real venture decision
  • Contribute to your Market sizing workbook deliverable

Unit overview

#LessonCore idea
1The Strategic Logic of Interview Design and Field ResearchCore frameworks for this unit
2Methods and Models for Interview Design and Field ResearchCore frameworks for this unit
3Evidence, Metrics and Assumptions in Interview Design and Field ResearchCore frameworks for this unit
4Interview Design and Field Research: From Analysis to ActionCore frameworks for this unit

Complete all four lessons, then finish unit assessments on this page.

Unit assessment

Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.

50% applied project30% case work20% knowledge checks

Exercises

Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.

ExerciseApplied practice: Interview Design and Field Research45 min
Complete a focused practice exercise on **Interview Design and Field Research**. 1. Choose a real company, product, or situation you know. 2. Apply one core framework from this unit to analyze it. 3. Write your analysis in 300–500 words with a clear recommendation. 4. Cite at least one credible source.

Deliverable

300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ENT 401.

Rubric

  • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
  • Specific evidence from a real example
  • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
  • Professional writing with source citation
ExerciseDrill: Interview Design and Field Research30 min
Work through the practice problems in the unit lesson without looking at notes. Then check your work against the lesson and write a short reflection: - What you got right - One mistake you caught - One concept to review before the next unit

Deliverable

Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ENT 401 workbook.

Rubric

  • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
  • Honest reflection on errors
  • Identifies a specific review action

Case analysis

Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.

CaseCase analysis: Interview Design and Field Research60 min
Analyze a real business case through the lens of **Interview Design and Field Research**. Choose a public company event, HBR-style case, or documented decision. **Deliverable structure:** 1. Situation summary (150 words) 2. Analysis using this unit's frameworks (400 words) 3. Recommendation (150 words) 4. Risks and what would change your mind

Deliverable

2-page case write-up in your portfolio.

Rubric

  • Case facts are accurate and sourced
  • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
  • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
  • Risks are specific, not generic

Knowledge quiz

Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.

1. RelayOps maps interview hours to top risks: dispatcher adoption, COO budget trigger, IT integration delay. What strategic logic does this mapping follow?

2. Which Mom Test adaptation is appropriate for RelayOps B2B discovery with COOs?

3. After 10 coded RelayOps interviews, tab_switching appeared in 9/10 notes. What is the correct next synthesis step?

4. RelayOps assumption A2 targets dispatcher rebalance loop ≤120 seconds. Prototype median was 112 seconds but p75 was 145. How should the team interpret this?

5. RelayOps IT calls showed review days of 30, 45, 60, 75, 40 (median 45, two above 45). Assumption A3 status became 'At risk.' Why?

6. Which question is an anti-pattern in RelayOps dispatcher interviews?

7. RelayOps Friday synthesis promotes CRM read sync after tag frequencies update. Which mistake is avoided by weekly synthesis memos?

8. RelayOps triangulates COO budget assumption A1 with interviews and anonymized overtime reports. Why triangulate before marking 'Supported'?