ENT 401 · Unit 3 of 6
Interview Design and Field Research
Customer Discovery and Opportunity Validation
Start unit · 4 lessons →Learning objectives
- Size markets with bottom-up and top-down logic
- Apply "Interview Design and Field Research" to a real venture decision
- Contribute to your Market sizing workbook deliverable
Unit overview
| # | Lesson | Core idea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Strategic Logic of Interview Design and Field Research | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 2 | Methods and Models for Interview Design and Field Research | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 3 | Evidence, Metrics and Assumptions in Interview Design and Field Research | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 4 | Interview Design and Field Research: From Analysis to Action | Core frameworks for this unit |
Complete all four lessons, then finish unit assessments on this page.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ENT 401.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ENT 401 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. RelayOps maps interview hours to top risks: dispatcher adoption, COO budget trigger, IT integration delay. What strategic logic does this mapping follow?
2. Which Mom Test adaptation is appropriate for RelayOps B2B discovery with COOs?
3. After 10 coded RelayOps interviews, tab_switching appeared in 9/10 notes. What is the correct next synthesis step?
4. RelayOps assumption A2 targets dispatcher rebalance loop ≤120 seconds. Prototype median was 112 seconds but p75 was 145. How should the team interpret this?
5. RelayOps IT calls showed review days of 30, 45, 60, 75, 40 (median 45, two above 45). Assumption A3 status became 'At risk.' Why?
6. Which question is an anti-pattern in RelayOps dispatcher interviews?
7. RelayOps Friday synthesis promotes CRM read sync after tag frequencies update. Which mistake is avoided by weekly synthesis memos?
8. RelayOps triangulates COO budget assumption A1 with interviews and anonymized overtime reports. Why triangulate before marking 'Supported'?