ENT 401 · Unit 1 of 6
Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing
Customer Discovery and Opportunity Validation
Start unit · 4 lessons →Learning objectives
- Run problem and solution interviews that produce actionable evidence
- Apply "Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing" to a real venture decision
- Contribute to your Interview repository (20+ conversations) deliverable
Unit overview
| # | Lesson | Core idea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foundations of Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 2 | Key Concepts and Vocabulary in Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 3 | Frameworks for Analyzing Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing | Core frameworks for this unit |
| 4 | Opportunity Selection and Problem Framing: Applied Business Decisions | Core frameworks for this unit |
Complete all four lessons, then finish unit assessments on this page.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ENT 401.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ENT 401 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. RelayOps founders initially pitched 'AI-powered route optimization.' After problem-first reframing, which statement best reflects a validated opportunity hypothesis?
2. In RelayOps exploratory scoring, hypothesis H1 (same-day dispatch rebalance) scored highest. Which mistake does treating a high score as proof of product-market fit represent?
3. RelayOps uses kill criteria such as 'fewer than four of ten ops leaders rank dispatch rework in top three pains.' What is the primary purpose of pre-set kill rules?
4. On the Problem Reframe Ladder, RelayOps interviews should focus on which rung for discovery conversations?
5. A PE-backed plumbing rollup with 1,200 technicians offers RelayOps a pilot with custom ERP integration in 90 days. Per Unit 1 beachhead rules, what is the best response?
6. RelayOps Problem-Solution Fit Canvas lists 'existing spend' as overtime and legacy scheduling modules. Why does existing spend matter for opportunity selection?
7. Which common mistake matches founders who ask 'Would you use our app?' in first customer meetings?
8. RelayOps weighted opportunity score for dispatch rebalance reached 89/100 while invoice documentation (H6) scored 57. What decision aligns with the 80/20 portfolio rule from Unit 1?