ECO 101 · Unit 6 of 6
Market Design and Policy
Microeconomics and Competitive Markets
Start unit · 5 lessons →Learning objectives
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
- to business decisions
- Apply the frameworks in "Market Design and Policy" to a real management decision
- Make progress on your Microeconomics and Competitive Markets case analysis applied project
Why this matters
Market Design and Policy is essential to Microeconomics and Competitive Markets. Lessons build fluency with anchor-company examples, worked problems, and assessments on the unit page.
Lesson
Unit overview
Complete all 5 lessons in order. Each lesson follows the program authoring standard: conceptual prose, worked examples, practice problems, and managerial judgment prompts. Finish unit exercises and the knowledge check before marking the unit complete.
Connection to applied work
This unit feeds directly into Microeconomics and Competitive Markets case analysis. As you read, capture notes, examples, and data you can reuse in that deliverable. Strong students finish each unit with a draft section of their project, not just highlights.
Practice
- Write a one-page summary of this unit in your own words without looking at the lesson.
- Find a real company example (public filing, news article, or personal experience) that illustrates the main concept.
- Draft one paragraph recommending an action a manager should take based on this unit.
- Add at least three terms from this unit to your course glossary.
Knowledge check
Answer these without notes before marking the unit complete:
- What is the central idea of "Market Design and Policy"?
- What mistake do beginners most often make when applying this material?
- How does this unit help you complete Microeconomics and Competitive Markets case analysis?
- What is one decision you face this month where this unit applies?
Key takeaways
- to business decisions
- Business concepts only matter when they change a decision.
- Your ECO 101 assessment (Demand, supply, elasticity, market structure, and strategic microeconomic reasoning.) rewards applied understanding, not memorization.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under ECO 101.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your ECO 101 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Retiring 2,400 MW coal reduces local air pollution but imposes transition costs on plant communities. Unpriced pollution before retirement is a:
2. Grid frequency stability benefits all users whether or not they pay extra. Non-excludable, non-rival grid reliability resembles:
3. The State PUC reviews ClearPeak's fuel cost pass-through and merger impacts. Which policy role is primary?
4. Advanced metering connects households (users) and third-party app providers (developers). Pricing one side affects the other. This is a:
5. Decoupling severs utility profit from volumetric sales so energy efficiency does not hurt allowed return. This incentive design addresses:
6. A carbon adder of $30/ton applied to coal dispatch raises effective marginal cost. If coal emits roughly 1 ton per MWh in a simplified lesson table, adder per MWh is about:
7. ClearPeak's capstone memo claims $600K monthly benefit from a market rule change at $4M baseline (15% lift). Conservative scenario cuts benefit 50%. Still fund if hurdle is $250K?
8. Integrating ECO 101 for ClearPeak's transition testimony, strongest package combines: