GPS 405 · Unit 5 of 6
Impact Measurement and Learning
Social Enterprise and Impact Measurement
Start unit · 4 lessons →Unit overview
This unit develops impact measurement, counterfactuals, and learning using Solara Foods as the anchor. You will apply results chain, counterfactual design, SROI cautions, learning loops to a live decision: Impact measurement protocol with ethical review and data ownership rules
Learning objectives
By the end of this unit, you should be able to:
- Explain core vocabulary for impact measurement, counterfactuals, and learning in plain language with Solara Foods examples
- Apply results chain to structure options, assumptions, and tradeoffs
- Build reconciled evidence tables with leading indicators and guardrail metrics
- Produce a decision memo with kill criteria and stakeholder dissent
Solara scenario
Auditors ask how Solara knows cocoa income gains are causal not commodity price luck. Design quasi-experimental evaluation for Kenya distributor incomes
Lessons in this unit
- Foundations and framing
- Concepts, mechanics, and operating rhythm
- Frameworks, evidence, and tradeoffs
- Applied decisions, case analysis, and executive synthesis
Assessment
Complete the unit knowledge check and applied exercise after Lesson 4. The exercise asks for a two-page memo on Impact measurement protocol with ethical review and data ownership rules with reconciliation checks and kill criteria.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under GPS 405.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your GPS 405 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Solara Foods faces: Auditors ask how Solara knows cocoa income gains are causal not commodity price luck. Which framing best matches executive decision practice?
2. Which evidence label is correctly applied for Solara Foods?
3. Omar Haddad asks which framework fits Design quasi-experimental evaluation for Kenya distributor incomes. Best answer?
4. Finance challenges a $420-scale recommendation in GPS 405. What passes scrutiny?
5. Which kill criterion is strongest for impact measurement, counterfactuals, and learning?
6. Stakeholder dissent is healthiest when:
7. Best one-sentence decision ask for this unit?
8. Solara Foods operates in 42 markets. What mistake should you avoid?