GPS 402 · Unit 2 of 6
Policy Analysis and Stakeholder Incentives
Business, Government and Public Policy
Start unit · 4 lessons →Unit overview
This unit develops policy analysis, welfare tradeoffs, and stakeholder incentives using Solara Foods as the anchor. You will apply cost-benefit analysis, stakeholder mapping, incentive alignment grid, deadweight loss intuition to a live decision: Advocacy strategy balancing public health narrative and commercial exposure
Learning objectives
By the end of this unit, you should be able to:
- Explain core vocabulary for policy analysis, welfare tradeoffs, and stakeholder incentives in plain language with Solara Foods examples
- Apply cost-benefit analysis to structure options, assumptions, and tradeoffs
- Build reconciled evidence tables with leading indicators and guardrail metrics
- Produce a decision memo with kill criteria and stakeholder dissent
Solara scenario
A proposed sugar tax in Mexico threatens Solara's beverage concentrate line but may reduce healthcare externalities. Omar Haddad prepares Solara's response to Mexico sugar tax with distributor coalition
Lessons in this unit
- Foundations and framing
- Concepts, mechanics, and operating rhythm
- Frameworks, evidence, and tradeoffs
- Applied decisions, case analysis, and executive synthesis
Assessment
Complete the unit knowledge check and applied exercise after Lesson 4. The exercise asks for a two-page memo on Advocacy strategy balancing public health narrative and commercial exposure with reconciliation checks and kill criteria.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under GPS 402.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your GPS 402 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Case analysis
Analyze a case using frameworks from this unit.
Deliverable
2-page case write-up in your portfolio.
Rubric
- • Case facts are accurate and sourced
- • Analysis uses unit frameworks explicitly
- • Recommendation is justified with tradeoffs
- • Risks are specific, not generic
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Solara Foods faces: A proposed sugar tax in Mexico threatens Solara's beverage concentrate line but may reduce healthcare externalities. Which framing best matches executive decision practice?
2. Which evidence label is correctly applied for Solara Foods?
3. Omar Haddad asks which framework fits Omar Haddad prepares Solara's response to Mexico sugar tax with distributor coalition. Best answer?
4. Finance challenges a $98M-scale recommendation in GPS 402. What passes scrutiny?
5. Which kill criterion is strongest for policy analysis, welfare tradeoffs, and stakeholder incentives?
6. Stakeholder dissent is healthiest when:
7. Best one-sentence decision ask for this unit?
8. Solara Foods operates in 42 markets. What mistake should you avoid?