Learning objectives
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
- Apply frameworks from \
- Apply the frameworks in "Risk and Return" to a real management decision
- Make progress on your Corporate Finance portfolio artifact applied project
Why this matters
Risk and Return is essential to Corporate Finance. Lessons build fluency with anchor-company examples, worked problems, and assessments on the unit page.
Lesson
Unit overview
Complete all 5 lessons in order. Each lesson follows the program authoring standard: conceptual prose, worked examples, practice problems, and managerial judgment prompts. Finish unit exercises and the knowledge check before marking the unit complete.
Connection to applied work
This unit feeds directly into Corporate Finance portfolio artifact. As you read, capture notes, examples, and data you can reuse in that deliverable. Strong students finish each unit with a draft section of their project, not just highlights.
Practice
- Write a one-page summary of this unit in your own words without looking at the lesson.
- Find a real company example (public filing, news article, or personal experience) that illustrates the main concept.
- Draft one paragraph recommending an action a manager should take based on this unit.
- Add at least three terms from this unit to your course glossary.
Knowledge check
Answer these without notes before marking the unit complete:
- What is the central idea of "Risk and Return"?
- What mistake do beginners most often make when applying this material?
- How does this unit help you complete Corporate Finance portfolio artifact?
- What is one decision you face this month where this unit applies?
Key takeaways
- Apply frameworks from \
- Business concepts only matter when they change a decision.
- Your FIN 201 assessment (Time value of money, risk and return, capital budgeting, and corporate valuation.) rewards applied understanding, not memorization.
Unit assessment
Complete each section below. Score 80%+ on the quiz to finish this unit's assessment.
Exercises
Apply what you learned in this unit with structured practice.
Deliverable
300–500 word analysis document saved to your portfolio under FIN 201.
Rubric
- • Framework applied correctly (not just named)
- • Specific evidence from a real example
- • Clear recommendation with tradeoffs acknowledged
- • Professional writing with source citation
Deliverable
Problem solutions + 150-word reflection in your FIN 201 workbook.
Rubric
- • Attempted all practice items before checking answers
- • Honest reflection on errors
- • Identifies a specific review action
Model / spreadsheet
Build or extend a spreadsheet model tied to this unit.
Deliverable
Spreadsheet file with Inputs / Model / Outputs tabs · One-paragraph summary of key insight from the model · Screenshot or export saved to portfolio
Rubric
- • Assumptions stated explicitly
- • Logic is auditable (formulas or steps visible)
- • Output answers a specific business question
- • Sensitivity or scenario considered
Knowledge quiz
Check your understanding before marking the unit complete.
1. Summit scenario returns: 50% +12%, 30% −8%, 20% +25%. Expected return closest to:
2. Two sites each σ=20%, correlation 0.3, equal weights. Portfolio σ is:
3. Market −4%, Summit β=1.1, total return −7%. Idiosyncratic component approx:
4. Summit CAPM: Rf 4.2%, β 1.1, MRP 5.5%. Cost of equity equals:
5. Unlevered β 0.85, D/E 0.625, tax 25%. Relevered β closest to:
6. Which risk is diversifiable in a PE portfolio of many healthcare assets?
7. Why might Summit sponsors demand return above CAPM 10.25%?
8. Using historical average stock return as hurdle rate for new projects is flawed because: